60 Minutes Exposes Fraudulent Stem Cell Therapies

Tonight I watched the 60 Minutes hidden camera special on stem cell fraud.  It left me with mixed emotions and more than a little confusion based on the comments (or edited comments) of Professor Joanne Kutzberg from Duke University (note: she was not the target of the investigative report).  It appeared from the 60 minutes piece that Kutzberg was saying there was no stem cell hope for Cerebral Palsy.

I have been tracking her team’s research for some time and the original Duke press release is online here. https://www.dtmi.duke.edu/news-publications/news/dtmi-news-archives/kurtzberg-and-team-move-forward-with-cerebral-palsy-cord-blood-study.  The Duke study was impressive enough that Medical College of Georgia is expanding and continuing the research.

Cerebral Palsy patient Dallas Hextell’s story was featured on the Today Show in 2010 and in that feature (unlike 60 Minutes) Kutzberg had a cameo talking about the hope of stem cells. Dallas was one of her patients and had a remarkable change from his own (autologous) cord blood stem cells within 5 days. You can find a link discussing the story here: http://singularityhub.com/2010/04/08/cord-blood-stem-cell-treatment-for-cerebral-palsy-in-clinical-trial/

To the credit of the medical expert from the Today Show, she stated that one of the things medicine doesn’t do very well is to listen to anecdotes like Dallas’.  I completely agree.

So you can see where at least some of my confusion comes from.

Now for the real dark side of stem cells.  Fraud.  60 minutes is to be applauded for exposing the profiteering taking place at centers around the World.  The Ecuadorian clinic run by an unlicensed American doctor actually sold dead and dysfunction cells by mail and shipped them to a family in the US.  Outrageous. The family had a child with cerebral palsy and the big question for me is why 60 minutes didn’t have Dr Kutzberg talking about the potential for autologous stem cells to help.  Perhaps the family didn’t have their child’s stored cord blood. This family had tried stem cells from a central American clinic with little to no effect.  But who knows what quality or quantity of viable cells were actually administered. Perhaps that child received no viable stem cells at all.  We just don’t have any way to know or find out at this time.

So who can you trust in stem cell off-label therapy?  Tough question and apart from EmCell where I was treated with stem cells, I don’t know who to trust.

A reasonable question for you is why do I trust EmCell? Let me try and work you through what I went through in my selection process.

EmCell is operated out of a government hospital in Ukraine and is fully licensed to perform fetal stem cell therapies in that country. Each lot of stem cells is certified as transplantable and disease free based on EU and US guidelines. That is not to say US policies approve of fetal stem cell therapies – they don’t – except under special FDA approved research studies. EmCell, however, is a joint government – private sector operation and is not a single for-profit doctor shop.  The specialists at EmCell have up to 20 years of experience with stem cell therapies and are widely published (albeit mostly in the Russian Language). Their team consists of a transplantation specialists, cell biologists, a neurologist, pediatricians and other specialists.  I encourage you to check this out for yourself like I did:  http://www.emcell.com/en/publications.htm

In addition, EmCell has numerous impressive patents (including 2 US patents for the treatment of HIV) on its cell therapies (http://www.emcell.com/en/patents.htm)  and frankly they are at least a decade ahead of most Western researchers in cell therapies.

Now a little more about real, although anecdotal observations and evidence, of neuroregeneration from fetal stem cells.  (Wikipedia has a reasonable discussion of this  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallerian_degeneration  and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peripheral_nerve_injury).

image

One patient I know very well is myself.  My first major lumbar disc injury took place in 1992 when I blew out a huge piece of my L5-S1 (lowest) disc and developed immediate problems.  A few days after this I had the large fragment of detached disc removed from my spine surgically.  My recover was quick and yet I maintained weakness in my left foot dorsiflexors (muscles that left up the foot from the ankle hinge joint). I would often stub my toes on that side, or trip on a step, curb or uneven surface. If I placed my left heel down I couldn’t hold my forefoot or toes up at all. I had to have additional surgery a couple of years later in 1994 when the loss of so much disc volume created impingent on the exiting nerves. I had a bone graft and fusion at that level. A few years after that the L4-5 herniated mostly on the left side and I had even more surgery. All in all I would estimate I had less than 10% of my normal strength on that left side when it came to ankle flexion. Now a little over 2 months after stem cells I have close to 80% strength back, and without any effort at rehabilitation. That is shocking to me.  In most of the research I am aware of damage to the axon (crushed by the disc and compression secondary to collapsing of the intervertebral space) should cause distal loss of axonal function and possible loss of the nerve cell body.

I was nearly 2 decades post injury with no recovery of peripheral muscle/nerve function in the area damaged by the disc injury.  That is not at all uncommon with major disc injuries, spinal cord injuries or nerve crush injuries.  I certainly wouldn’t have expected recovery after 19 years, even from fetal stem cell transplantation.  But it happened very quickly. Faster than it should have happened.  That puzzled me.

So I began searching for more clues to this remarkable effect. As with many persistent neurological deficits – even ones like disc injury related peripheral neuropathy – immune cells in the nervous system likely inhibit recovery of function.  I truly do not think I regrew nerves that quickly.  So what was the effect of stem cells on this process?

It is not fully understood (at least by me), but most likely it has to do with neurotrophic factors and anti-inflammatory regulatory effects of the fetal transplanted cells. This may be related to the TNF-alpha inhibition I have previously discussed on this blog.

Equally, I suspect the effects being observed in the early changes taking place with the children with autism I have been following are not due to neuroregeneration in the central nervous system.  It is just too fast to be secondary to migration and repair of neurocircuitry from peripherally transplanted neurostem cells. While that may happen over the next 12 –24 months, the more likely effects are from stem cell mediated neuroregulation of inflammation.

While 60 Minutes reminds us all to be wary of the false claims and poor quality of stem cells being offered around the world, there is evidence the cells offered at EmCell have therapeutic potential and are actually different.  With that we need to be careful to not discard all non-US work as fraudulent. Researchers from the US ought to be making the trek to Kiev to learn just what it is they are doing differently and even better than those therapies offered in the US.

About Dr Bradstreet
Dr Bradstreet is a graduate of the University of South Florida College of Medicine and received his residency training at Wilford Hall USAF Medical Center. He is a Fellow of the American Academy of Family Physicians. He is an Adjunct Professor at the Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine in Arizona. He is extensively published in the peer-reviewed literature on subjects of autism, oxidative stress, mitochondrial disorders, virology, hyperbaric oxygen, and toxicology (especially heavy metal chelation). He is trained in the the isolation and use of stem cells.

4 Responses to 60 Minutes Exposes Fraudulent Stem Cell Therapies

  1. Nikki Burkhead says:

    When you say the “immune cells in the nervous system likely inhibit recovery of function” – could that be our microglial cells. I know of someone who recovered their son by inhibiting microglial activation. He used NSAIDs but there has also been talk of stem cells inhibiting microglial activation. Could that be what is causing the early gains after stem cell treatment? Also thank you for posting about the 60 minutes. We didn’t get to watch it although we wanted to so getting your insight was very valuable to us! We actually have our son’s cord blood banked with CBR and I get e-mails from them frequently. They have 2 FDA approved clinical trials going on right now for cerebral palsy (one headed by Dr Joanne Kurtzberg at Duke) and from what I have read I too thought the trials were showing hope for cerebral palsy and other neurodegenerative diseases. Did she say in the piece she is not seeing any benefits from her clinical trial being done at Duke University for cerebral palsy? Thanks

    • In all fairness to her – no doubt her comments were highly edited but the impression from the 60 minutes piece was there is no hope for cerebral palsy from stem cells and she expected nothing in stem cell treatments for 10 years. I disagree

  2. Star Laz says:

    In all fairness Dr. B, anyone who follows you or is a patient of yours knows that the report had nothing to do with “the work” you do. You must compare apples to apples, and that report had nothing to do with the type of work you do-other than be a similar topic.
    Now I am not a doc, or an expert or have alphabet behind or before my name, I am just a mother with a child with Autism.
    You can prove and have document forward progress in the cases you take on-that guy on the news report-well we all see what he had to offer. You do not have listed on any of your sites Paypal trade for stem cells. It is my belief that if you have paypal for purchasing stem cells, well, that in itself is a huge big red truck (not even a flag but a truck).
    It is know and is true (and proven in my humble opinion) that there are bad apples in every field. How many bad lawyers are there? What about Enron?
    Dr. B, get on with your work and keep going, you are going in the right direction-you can prove it with hard core paper written down facts! If there is anyone who wants to have a comparison of that show and you, they need to understand the patient care is not similar, and your bedside manor is not at the same level of comparison. Lets compare apples to apples, that is what I have to say about it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,874 other followers

%d bloggers like this: